Task and Methodological Recommendations Role-playing game: "Choosing a Financial Guarantor from the Register of Guarantors of the State Customs Service of Ukraine According to the Role Scheme ‘Presenter – Opponent – Reviewer’"
Role-playing game: "Choosing a Financial Guarantor from the Register of Guarantors of the State Customs Service of Ukraine According to the Role Scheme ‘Presenter – Opponent – Reviewer’"
Game Format: Discussion in the "Presenter – Opponent – Reviewer" triangle
Game Rules:
Presenter – prepares a detailed analysis of one financial guarantor from the Register of Guarantors of the State Customs Service of Ukraine to ensure the payment of customs duties. The presentation should cover:
The mechanism of this guarantor’s operation
Its advantages and disadvantages
Situations where it is most appropriate
Real-world examples
Opponent – analyzes the presentation, identifies weaknesses, and provides reasoned criticism. The opponent's task is to demonstrate that the proposed financial guarantor from the Register of Guarantors of the State Customs Service of Ukraine has risks or may be less effective in certain situations.
Reviewer – evaluates the performances of both participants, summarizes the discussion, and highlights the strengths and weaknesses of their arguments. The reviewer's task is to be an impartial judge and conclude which financial guarantor is the most effective in specific situations.
Game Procedure:
The teacher divides the participants into three groups and assigns each group a financial guarantor to analyze.
Each group has a presenter, an opponent, and a reviewer.
Each participant has 5-7 minutes for their presentation.
After all groups have presented, a general discussion and conclusion session takes place.